FMCG
·
100+ employees

Live in weeks instead of a year

Challenge
Every previous proofreading solution the company evaluated came with the same shape: a project fee, a multi-month implementation timeline, and a team that had to be pulled off other work to manage the rollout.
solution
Content Compare deployed browser-native, with onboarding, training, and the validation package included — live and running in weeks, not the year some vendors quoted.
result
The team started catching label errors across export markets almost immediately, without ever running an internal IT project to get there.
All customer stories

Growth-Stage FMCG/CPG Company

growthstagefmcg.example
Industry
FMCG
Location
Austria (multi-market export)
Size
100+ employees
Modules used
share this story
Copy link
Challenge

A project before the project even starts

As a family-owned cosmetics manufacturer exporting to more than 80 countries, the company's labeling requirements were already complex before anyone touched a proofreading tool — multiple languages, market-specific regulatory text, private-label variants alongside its own brands. Every vendor they evaluated for artwork verification quoted the same kind of engagement: a project fee just to get started, a multi-month implementation timeline, and an internal resourcing commitment that meant pulling people off their actual jobs to manage a software rollout.

For a company that size, with a lean regulatory and quality team already stretched across export markets, that wasn't a realistic cost of entry — it was a reason to keep doing manual proofing for another year.

"Every quote we got started with a project plan before we'd even seen the product work on our own labels." — Head of Regulatory Affairs
Solution

Live before the old quote would have even started

Content Compare is browser-native, so there was no local software to install and no IT infrastructure to provision before the team could start working. Onboarding, live training, and the validation package — test plan, risk assessment, executed test cases — were included from day one, with no separate internal validation project to commission. The team went from first demo to actively verifying real export labels in a matter of weeks, not the multi-month runway other vendors had quoted.

"We kept waiting for the catch — the part where it turned into a bigger project. There wasn't one." — Quality Manager
Result

Catching errors across markets – almost immediately

Within weeks of go-live, the team was running real label comparisons across its export markets — catching translation and formatting inconsistencies that had previously depended on each market's local reviewer catching them independently. No IT project was ever opened internally to make it happen, and the lean regulatory team didn't need to grow to support the rollout.

"We didn't reorganize anything to make this work. It just started working." — Head of Regulatory Affairs
read also

Related stories